Rename generic sheet to make it more clear that it's only for actors

module/sheets/GenericActorSheet.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+export class GenericActorSheet extends ActorSheet {
+	_expanded = new Set();
+
+	#propogatedSettings = [
+		`devMode`,
+		`showAvatarOnSheet`,
+		`playersCanChangeGroup`,
+		`resourcesOrSupplies`,
+	];
+
+	getData() {
+		const ctx = super.getData();
+
+		// Send all of the settings that sheets need into their context
+		ctx.settings = {};
+		for (const setting of this.#propogatedSettings) {
+			ctx.settings[setting] = game.settings.get(`dotdungeon`, setting);
+		};
+
+		ctx.isGM = game.users.current.hasRole(CONST.USER_ROLES.ASSISTANT);
+
+		ctx.meta = {
+			expanded: this._expanded,
+		};
+
+		return ctx;
+	};
+
+	activateListeners(html) {
+		if (this.document.isEmbedded) return;
+		if (!this.isEditable) return;
+		console.debug(`.dungeon | Generic sheet adding listeners`);
+
+		html.find(`.roll`).on(`click`, this._handleRoll);
+		html.find(`summary`).on(`click`, this._handleSummaryToggle);
+	};
+
+
+	_handleSummaryToggle($e) {
+		let data = $e.target.dataset;
+		let open = $e.target.parentNode.open;
+		console.debug(`.dungeon | Collapse ID: ${data.collapseId} (open: ${open})`);
+		/*
+		This seeming inversion of logic is due to the fact that this handler
+		gets called before the element is updated to include/reflect the
+		change, so if the parentNode doesn't actually have it, then we're
+		opening it and vice-versa.
+		*/
+		if (!open) {
+			this._expanded.add(data.collapseId);
+		} else {
+			this._expanded.delete(data.collapseId);
+		};
+	}
+
+
+	_handleRoll($e) {
+		let data = $e.target.dataset;
+		if (!data.roll) return;
+		console.debug(`.dungeon | Attempting to roll ${data.roll}`);
+	};
+}